Social Resources

Class

Overview

In addition to skin color, socio-economic class is another ladder that has been used to rank and oppress people. In White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America, Nancy Isenberg documents that the United States has always been highly stratified in its drive to accumulate wealth, power, and/or status and has taught everyone to look down on those “below.” In the British colonies, John Winthrop, a seventeenth-century leader of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, declared a basic principle for his newly forming community, “God Almightie in his most holy and wise providence hath soe disposed the Condition of mankind, as in all times some must be rich, some poor, some high and eminent in power and dignitie; others mean and in subjection.”

John Adams, second President of the United States, reinforced this point when he affirmed “passion for distinction in the ranks and the order of society" and declared, "There must be one, indeed, who is the last and lowest of the human species." Envy of those above, competition with peers, and contempt for the lower has been a guiding principle for this nation. 

The Founding Fathers structured the government to guard against too much popular power. They established just enough democracy to gain sufficient support for the hierarchical social order, while preventing egalitarian rebellions against elite landowners.

The rise of industrialization in the 19th century led to more stratification and abject poverty. The emergence of total institutions for civilians like prisons, reform schools, and nursing homes reflected this regimentation. Workers fought back and formed some unions, but it wasn’t until 1933 that the goovernment legalized the right to organize (a right that has been undermined recently).

As advertising became a prominent and powerful force shaping attitudes and values in the mid-19th century, buying ever more consumer goods gained greater importance. As Wesley Yang reports in his review of Barbara Ehrenreich’s work, the result was “the emergence of a “meaner, more selfish outlook, hostile to the aspirations of those less fortunate” among the professional-managerial classes…. The corporate world is nowadays subject to ‘a perpetual winnowing,’... expelling, with a terrifying indiscriminateness, even the most efficient workers, in good economic times and bad....Corporations lay off people to protect their stock prices by meeting quarterly profit goals, with little regard for the impact on people, long term corporate goals, the environment, or their local communities.

In America, the System has promoted the most selfish culture in the history of the world. The worship of money, fame, status, and power-over-others is pervasive. The American way has been: “I’m willing to sacrifice you and the environment for my gratification.”

Ehrenreich’s Nickel and Dimed: On Getting By in America (2001) reported on her own experience in working-class jobs. According to Yang, the book “fed an almost prurient fascination with the bodily pain inflicted on the middle-class’s underlings. Watching the respected author sweat-soaked in stifling heat, forbidden to take a drink of water, on her hands and knees while scrubbing a linoleum floor, made visible something that is always right in the open but invisible to middle-class eyes....”

Ehrenreich’s Bait and Switch: The Pursuit of the American Dream reports on her job-search efforts and “focuses on the subtler psychological exactions made on the dignity of the middle class. We watch as Ehrenreich posts her resume at Monster.com and HotJobs...and receives a business-professional image makeover.” Ehrenreich “skewers the florid inanity of much that she encounters with her characteristic wit, painting a picture of a corporate world ‘paralyzed by conformity, and shot through with magical thinking.’ The world she describes demands absolute obedience…. Workers are urged never to blame their employers or the economy for their straitened condition, lest bitterness infect the ‘winning attitude’ they must at all times exude…. The white-collar job-seeker faces, she notes, ‘far more intrusive psychological demands than a laborer or clerk.’ Browbeaten from all sides to display ‘cheerfulness, upbeatness, and compliance,’ submissive employees turn out to be the easiest to fire.... Ehrenreich [reports on] her fellow job seekers’ often heart-rending predicaments….”

Class Resources

Articles/Essays/Op-eds

  • Status Anxiety Is Blowing Wind Into Trump’s Sails (behind paywall), The New York Times, February 9, 2022,

    Thomas B. Edsall. “…It is hardly a secret that the white working class has struggled in recent decades — and clearly many factors play a role — but what happens to those without the skills and abilities needed to move up the education ladder to a position of prestige in an increasingly competitive world?

    Petersen’s answer: They have become populism’s frontline troops.

    Over the past six decades, according to Petersen, there has been a realignment of the parties in respect to their position as pro-establishment or anti-establishment… ‘Economic insecurity translates into support for the far-right’”. [read more; behind paywall]

  • Trump True Believers Have Their Reasons (behind paywall), Thomas B. Edsall.

    “Epistemic hubris — the expression of unwarranted factual certitude — is prevalent, bipartisan and associated with both intellectualism (an identity marked by ruminative habits and learning for its own sake) and anti-intellectualism (negative affect toward intellectuals and the intellectual establishment). The division between intellectualism and anti-intellectualism, they write, is ‘distinctly partisan: intellectuals are disproportionately Democratic, whereas anti-intellectuals are disproportionately Republican. By implication, we suggest that both the intellectualism of blue America and the anti-intellectualism of red America contribute to the intemperance and intransigence that characterize civil society in the United States.’ In addition, according to Barker, Marietta and DeTamble, ‘The growing intellectualism of blue America and anti-intellectualism of red America, respectively, may partially explain the tendency by both to view the other as some blend of dense, duped and dishonest.’” [read more; behind paywall]

  • Intellectualism, Anti-Intellectualism, and Epistemic Hubris in Red and Blue America, David C. Barker, Ryan Detamble, Morgan Marietta.

    “Epistemic hubris—the expression of unwarranted factual certitude—is a conspicuous yet understudied democratic hazard. Here, in two nationally representative studies, we examine its features and analyze its variance. We hypothesize, and find, that epistemic hubris is (a) prevalent, (b) bipartisan, and (c) associated with both intellectualism (an identity marked by ruminative habits and learning for its own sake) and anti-intellectualism (negative affect toward intellectuals and the intellectual establishment). Moreover, these correlates of epistemic hubris are distinctly partisan: intellectuals are disproportionately Democratic, whereas anti-intellectuals are disproportionately Republican. By implication, we suggest that both the intellectualism of Blue America and the anti-intellectualism of Red America contribute to the intemperance and intransigence that characterize civil society in the United States.”

  • Toyin Ojih Odutola’s Visions of Power, Zadie Smith.

    “In their depictions of domination, the artist’s works, full of world-building and philosophy, do more than flip the script.... It speaks of two beings who hoped to start a revolution by genuinely recognizing each other, in their full selves, and thus momentarily challenged a system expressly constructed to keep them apart.”

  • The white-collar blues, Wesley Yang.

    "Back in 1989, Barbara Ehrenreich’s magisterial Fear of Falling: The Inner Life of the Middle Class charted the emergence of a “meaner, more selfish outlook, hostile to the aspirations of those less fortunate” among the professional-managerial classes.”

  • Barbara Ehrenreich on the Middle Class, Ezta Klein Show.

  • Why the New Research on Mobility Matters: An Economist’s View, Justin Wolfers.

  • The Opportunity Atlas: Mapping the Childhood Roots of Social Mobility, Raj Chetty and others.

Books

Podcasts

  • We Build Civilizations on Status. But We Barely Understand It, Ezra Klein Show with Cecilia Ridgeway.

    You can listen to the podcast on your favorite platform. The transcript is here.

From the Intro:

Cecilia Ridgeway is a sociologist and professor emerita at Stanford University. She spent her entire career studying what she calls the deep story of status, what it is, why it matters, how it works and all the ways it shapes our world. And Ridgeway’s basic argument is that the way we typically think about status is all wrong. Status isn’t just some social vanity limited to elite institutions or the top percentages of the income ladder. It’s a cultural system that is absolutely fundamental to how our society operates, one that permeates literally every aspect of our lives, from the office, to the classroom, to the dinner table. At the heart of Ridgeway’s theory and of this conversation is what she calls the double-edged sword of status...

My comment:

While listening to this valuable podcast, it struck me that they did not address the need to respect everyone's essential equality, as does Beatrice Bruteau https://americansforhumanity.net/books-systemic when she affirms "a worldview that features the incomparable value of each person, [which leads to] mutual respect and care." Recognizing everyone's "incomparable value" seems to be a critical starting point. At the conclusion, however, the podcast does touch on this issue with these remarks:

Secondly, respect others. Respect others. Understand that they’re all in this game too. And treat them with respect. If you want to be treated with respect, treat others with respect. It works. It works. So that can help. Because a lot of when you get really obsessed with status, it’s because nobody treats you with it. You don’t get no respect. But if you respect others, they tend to respect you back. They do. And then that gets you through.

But even here they don't clearly affirm everyone's infinite value.

Comment